News

Councilman Micah Posner undercover at the Coral Street Shelter. Photo by Chip Scheuer.

Councilman Micah Posner undercover at the Coral Street Shelter. Photo by Chip Scheuer.

When Santa Cruz city councilmember Micah Posner got home this past Thursday morning, he couldn’t help crying, thinking about the night he had just spent at the Coral Street Shelter in Harvey West. “That’s my main emotional take on it,” Posner says. “It’s sad place to be. There are a lot of people who are bummed out and very full of regrets.”

With the Homeless Services Center under increased scrutiny, Posner arranged to get a firsthand look into the shelter before budgeting discussions start. Staff brought an extra bed out, so he didn’t take anyone’s spot. He told other guests that he had recently gotten out of jail and been kicked out of his girlfriend’s house.

Posner says the sadness and regrets in the shelter reminded him most of a night he spent in jail for civil disobedience after a war protest 20 years ago.

He adds that, out of dozens of people there, a few were working to get ahead. One man left at 6am for a job interview in San Jose. Another was enrolling at Cabrillo College. Most of the people he saw seemed to be addicts, he says, but none were using drugs at the shelter. One person left an MP3 player plugged into the wall unattended and came back to find it stolen, he says. Staff tried to locate it, but was unable to.

Posner will share his thoughts that these people shouldn’t be “kicked when they’re down” with his fellow councilmembers, who he curiously says he didn’t think to notify before his stay. Mayor Hilary Bryant did not comment for this story, and no other councilmembers could be reached by press time.

Posner is not the first city councilmember this year to use personal observations to defend feelings about the shelter. (See Lynn Robinson’s letter about Harvey West incidents to HSC director Monica Martinez.) But we can just picture other councilmembers rolling their eyes when Posner invokes his new expertise on homeless issues during discussions about the shelter over the next year. Too bad they didn’t think of it first.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Carol J. Colin

    I stayed at River Street Shelter myself and still go back there for art therapy with Cheryl Ruby.  This last year they have expanded the women’s dorm and painted all the rooms cheerful, warm colors. Paintings from the art therapy class adorn the walls and there are live plants inside flowers on the table and a beautiful, carefully tended garden outside. I find River Street a pleasant place to visit where staff are compassionate and helpful.  I don’t know where Mr. Posner stayed but I don’t think it could have been River Street Shelter he was talking about.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Amber Schat

    Dear SC Weekly,

    I think that it takes courage and heart to attempt putting yourself in the shoes of others, especially when you may have a public or political reputation to protect. I commend council member Micah Posner for noting shying away from the reality of the homeless issues our county is facing, and although I don’t agree with fabricating a story to get his foot in the door or gain the confidence of the people who uses the shelter for support, I think the larger point is clear. Obviously this shelter is necessary. It needs to stay and could use additional funding for programs that help people get back on their feet after tough addiction issues, or financial hardships. Excluding those who choose a transient lifestyle, are those who truly seek to be active and useful members of a community and society. That is why the shelter exists, and should continue to work to ease the incredible emotional and mental burdens that come with not being able to provide for oneself or family. It is these basic services and access to support that have made it possible for me, a current graduate student, to get up when I myself was homeless and broke. People are incredibly strong, if only given a fighting chance and a shoulder to lean on in tough times. It is no proud or easy place to be in ones life when you find the bottom, and the journey back to normalcy is long and winding. Please share this sentiment with our council members as they debate how best to support those most in need of opportunities to reintegrate and build positive options in their lives.

    Most Sincerely,

    Amber Schat

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Brent Adams

    It should be noted that while Mr. Posner was able to have a bed put out for him specifically,  for homeless people that very same “Emergency Shelter” that shelter has a one month waiting list. 

    I find this important point missing in this article and in most people’s perception of homelessness.  There actually isn’t some place for folks to go.

    This is why many of us are now advocating for a Sanctuary Camp with partnerships and allowances by local governing bodies and the community at large. 
    Only 95% of homeless have a shelter bed tonight.

    https://www.facebook.com/santacruzsanctuary

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Robert Norse

    I think what Brent meant to say was 95% of the homeless do NOT have shelter tonight.

    The sooner there’s a Sanctuary Camp, the better.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Don Honda

    “…he couldn’t help crying, “

    “Most of the people he saw seemed to be addicts, he says, but none were using drugs at the shelter.”

    We need to distinguish true compassion from “idiot compassion”. We sometimes over-react emotionally at the sight of suffering. We can be so distressed that we weep uncontrollably, faint or run away in horror. Our heart may be moved with pity but our emotions are so out-of-control that we can’t do anything to help! In other cases we might do something but because we lack right understanding of the problem or the person experiencing it, our “help” only makes the situation worse. These are examples of idiot compassion. True compassion balances loving-concern with clear wisdom. This wisdom enables us to stay calm and think clearly how best to help, without being carried away by our emotions.

    Ven Sangye Khadro from The Four Immeasurables

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Reality Check

    “… but none were using drugs at the shelter…”

    That isn’t a valid statement.  He can say that he didn’t observe anyone using drugs, or that nobody said they were using drugs, or they said they weren’t using drugs, but he has no idea what happens outside of his observations.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Tiffany

    I am a compassionate person and I have known people with hardship and there should be a shelter for homeless and battered women or men. However I do not think our town should become a bum’s paradise. If you are not from here you should be given a bus ticket back to where ever it is you came from.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Kem Akol

    I’ve always known Micah to have an open mind when debating issues…we have not always been on the same side of the arguments…but he strives to do his research…and base his opinions on solid logic…good for him to be brave enough, and devote the extra time to go after this issue…

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Brian Christian

    Wow. One night in a homeless shelter and now he’s an expert with the power to ‘Do something about it!’. This reminds me of all those college kids that go to some third world country and come back and have a crystal clear understanding of the personal plight of the native peoples of… wherever.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy SC mom

    im sorry but staying one night is a shelter and being moved to tears is not even worth putting into print! or news worthy!!!
    Micah Posner / Brent Adams and Robert Norse need to roll up there sleeves join the “clean team” and get out there and see the real impact the empathy for these group of people has done to our town!
    I have empathy for homeless who are trying to get back on their feet and be a contributing member to society. I have zero tolerance for the Transient drug users who are stealing from us all, discarding needles in our parks, beaches and dumping trash, feces and polluting our creeks and rivers!
    the last thing Santa Cruz needs is a “Sanctuary camp” to enable more transients to come to our town and thrash it!!!  we already have enough services in place to provide homeless with help

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Rob Mylls

    Poser and Norse are cut from the same cloth.  They just want 15 minutes of fame once a week.  If they truly wanted to help, they would point out the people who need help and then those who are criminals.  But instead they choose to be monkey wrenches, attention grabbers and only make things worse for all of us.  Camping out one night in a cot and Posnering for a picture is not helping.  There are people who need help and I wish we would focus on them.  Not that Poser went to a sleepover one night and felt sad.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Tiffany Bitney

    WELL SAID SC MOM!!! AND I HOPE IT’S HEARD!

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy James Burtnett

    Mr.Plsner spent one night really not much time to be judging. Nobody doing drugs there none that they wanted to share with you.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy James Burtnett

    I wouldn’t call that putting yourself in others shoes he observed not put.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Sc mom

    Well said!

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy brad kava

    Great story..but do you guys copy edit anymore?
    None is a singular…none is..

    Staff in the way you used it would be plural…the staff were unable to find it…

    Despite that, I’m linking it to Santa Cruz Patch..nice work.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Jacob Pierce

    Thanks, Brad, for looking out for us! And for linking to us too. I mean that, man.
    Anyway last I checked, “none” can be either plural or singular, depending on its antecedent. I will double-check, though. I’ve been wrong before (and this would NOT be the first time a mistake has slipped through…)

    And “staff,” I think, might fall into a gray area of its own. I believe it’s singular if you’re talking about everyone on staff and plural if your talking about several (but not all) staff members… so maybe either would be correct here? But now my head’s starting to hurt.

    As for our lack of copy editors, you def caught us. We hired Georgia’s pet cat for about three and a half weeks. But she’s out on medical leave with astigmatism. *sigh*

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Steve

    “Posnering”. Is that like “planking”. raspberry

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Over it

    Great!  Why don’t you have it in your yard, Robert?

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy JoMont

    Santa Cruz Mom…..right on! I worked for 25+ years with homeless and nearly homeless and many of these situations sadly, were based on choice as we kept more than once, to fund, house and pick people up by the bootstraps, only to watch them choose their addictions over a leg up. The drugs and alcohol addictions should be dealt with first. Once recovery begins, the trickle down is like Niagara Falls.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy sonia

    I totally support your statement SC mom. Love it. Enough is enough. With a population of over 10% of homeless I think we are doing our part. The house is full. We should also not forget the stabbing of a woman lately by one of them. Do we need more to wake up? I wish we could live in a more evolved community thinking that this is now 2013 not 1960.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Paul

    Considering most of you who are judging him and the shelter have never stepped foot on the property, I think it’s a pretty commendable act.
    That makes him more of an expert than you, sadly.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Bruce Korb

    @Amber—word of the day “grandstanding”

    From personal interactions with Micah, I know him to be a spoiled brat. Those descriptive terms derive from his contributions to the Transportation Funding Task Force wherein he was true to his word.  If things didn’t go his way, he would spoil it for everyone else.  That’s what he did.  This was all about trying to gain credibility in his “my way or the highway” agenda.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Hello?

    What Posner! Honestly going to the homeless shelter, letting staff know who you are (guessing so they can watch over and protect you) and getting an extra bed that didn’t take away from anyone else.  Really?  They had a spare bed and place for you, but not for a actual homeless person?  You went in with an open mind?  I think you went in with a closed mind,, closed to what you were seeing.  You saw what you wanted to, the poor homeless that many just happen to be addicts, it was enough to make you cry.  You defend the addicts with the fact that TWO of the homeless (probably not addicts) were trying to make something of their lives.
    You proudly say you didn’t see anyone doing drugs in your sleeping area.  Do you think the addicts (let’s just call them druggies) were actually going to pull out their needles and poke themselves in front of you?  Do you think they would get their kits out in front of everyone?  Come on grow up.  One night with a closed mind isn’t going to give anyone a reality check.

  • https://www.santacruz.com/news/2013/04/23/inside_the_homeless_shelter_controversy Dave

    Lets assume for a moment that Posner is correct and that most residents of the HSC, though they appear to be drug addicts, did not actually consume drugs while there. What I find ironic is that the HSC would certainly not tolerate drug use on their campus, nor presumably urination on thier walls, feces in their landscaping, discarded needles on their sidewalks, theft of personal property and so on but seem to expect the Santa Cruz community to tolerate these things in our public spaces.

    Is this a double standard?

    Is it fair to the rest of us who live here to endure the behavior that you wouldnt tolerate yourself?

    If you are going to welcome people to our community who engage in self destructive and antisocial behavior then you can’t expect to select which behavior is and is not acceptable within your walls.

    Given the choice I would prefer the HSC to be the place where all drug abuse occurred.